Imagine the evaluation session: 1 º ESO. A group consisting of: "Three students
very good.
"A brilliant student academically intellectually but not because in his spare time to read literature (Tolkien, Bram Stoker, Stevenson, Delibes ...). Of course, terribly bored in class. Four
-normal (of five or six and one suspended)
vague
-Eight-Two with literacy problems severe. "Two of compensatory
. For the Board
assessment, this group is a disaster. Analyzes their school record: none of the ten students who have failed more than 4 (now after lso discuss compensatory) repeated at school. In particular, one of these girls was about to do but decided that it was inappropriate because his older brother had made him repeat, and had suffered a great trauma.
But in this evaluation session were already agreed upon measures to be taken between the tutor and leadership: the group is so weak that it is best to act like a group of Reinforcing Curriculum in all subjects, informally. No one says anything, nobody questions that the students be repeated if the situation remains unchanged in June, no one asks for the eight students excellent group, no one demands anything for them: they have no rights.
For those of compensatory: never repeated. Diagnosed and the school come although it is suspected that do not qualify to be there (it's implied that his problem is similar to the above: they are vague). But for those no problem: they put a 5 because they have a primary adaptation. While reading the new rules: the countervailing titled and spend of course, that is, within two years, will be in 3 º ESO and then 4 ° C in a normal group even after a 1 st and 2 nd with an adaptation of 3 º Primary Schools in all subjects.
Finally, warns the head teacher, before leaving for vacation, he must deliver a customized report with the number of success and failure for the course. We can imagine that firms will be called to decide the statistical break.
very good.
"A brilliant student academically intellectually but not because in his spare time to read literature (Tolkien, Bram Stoker, Stevenson, Delibes ...). Of course, terribly bored in class. Four
-normal (of five or six and one suspended)
vague
-Eight-Two with literacy problems severe. "Two of compensatory
. For the Board
assessment, this group is a disaster. Analyzes their school record: none of the ten students who have failed more than 4 (now after lso discuss compensatory) repeated at school. In particular, one of these girls was about to do but decided that it was inappropriate because his older brother had made him repeat, and had suffered a great trauma.
But in this evaluation session were already agreed upon measures to be taken between the tutor and leadership: the group is so weak that it is best to act like a group of Reinforcing Curriculum in all subjects, informally. No one says anything, nobody questions that the students be repeated if the situation remains unchanged in June, no one asks for the eight students excellent group, no one demands anything for them: they have no rights.
For those of compensatory: never repeated. Diagnosed and the school come although it is suspected that do not qualify to be there (it's implied that his problem is similar to the above: they are vague). But for those no problem: they put a 5 because they have a primary adaptation. While reading the new rules: the countervailing titled and spend of course, that is, within two years, will be in 3 º ESO and then 4 ° C in a normal group even after a 1 st and 2 nd with an adaptation of 3 º Primary Schools in all subjects.
Finally, warns the head teacher, before leaving for vacation, he must deliver a customized report with the number of success and failure for the course. We can imagine that firms will be called to decide the statistical break.
0 comments:
Post a Comment